This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: minimalistic MI catch support
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Markus Schiltknecht <markus at bluegap dot ch>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 18:29:13 -0500
- Subject: Re: minimalistic MI catch support
- References: <1138453464.15400.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 02:04:24PM +0100, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> Hello gdb hackers,
>
> working on an automated debugging layer on top of gdb I figured the
> catchpoint functions in the MI interface is missing. The attached patch
> against current CVS at least makes gdb report a catchpoint-break via MI.
> This is already sufficient for my application. However, I would
> appreciate a complete catchpoint implementation for the MI interface. I
> haven't figured out how to implement the '-break-catch' command. If
> somebody more knowledgable could do that I'd be thankfull.
>
> Please CC me in responses, as I'm not subscribed.
Hi Markus,
For the -break-catch command, I recommend you file an issue in our bug
system; that won't help it get done any sooner, but at least it won't
get lost.
For the patch, in general it's better to avoid ui_out_is_mi_like_p when
we can. Because the text outputs are ignored in non-MI mode, this is
usually pretty easy; see the attached.
This changes from:
*stopped,thread-id="0",frame={addr="0x00002aaaaaeb6462",func="fork",args=[],from="/lib/libc.so.6"}
to:
*stopped,reason="breakpoint-hit",bkptno="1",forked-process="6570",thread-id="0",frame={addr="0x00002aaaaaeb6462",func="fork",args=[],from="/lib/libc.so.6"}
You used fork and vfork for the reasons; I'm not sure whether these
should have separate reasons or be marked as catchpoint-hit. Bob,
Nick, any opinions on that?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
Index: breakpoint.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/breakpoint.c,v
retrieving revision 1.221
diff -u -p -r1.221 breakpoint.c
--- breakpoint.c 6 Feb 2006 21:55:05 -0000 1.221
+++ breakpoint.c 6 Feb 2006 23:28:32 -0000
@@ -2167,17 +2167,29 @@ print_it_typical (bpstat bs)
case bp_catch_fork:
annotate_catchpoint (bs->breakpoint_at->number);
- printf_filtered (_("\nCatchpoint %d (forked process %d), "),
- bs->breakpoint_at->number,
- bs->breakpoint_at->forked_inferior_pid);
+ ui_out_text (uiout, "\nCatchpoint ");
+ if (ui_out_is_mi_like_p (uiout))
+ ui_out_field_string (uiout, "reason",
+ async_reason_lookup (EXEC_ASYNC_BREAKPOINT_HIT));
+ ui_out_field_int (uiout, "bkptno", bs->breakpoint_at->number);
+ ui_out_text (uiout, " (forked process ");
+ ui_out_field_int (uiout, "forked-process",
+ bs->breakpoint_at->forked_inferior_pid);
+ ui_out_text (uiout, "), ");
return PRINT_SRC_AND_LOC;
break;
case bp_catch_vfork:
annotate_catchpoint (bs->breakpoint_at->number);
- printf_filtered (_("\nCatchpoint %d (vforked process %d), "),
- bs->breakpoint_at->number,
- bs->breakpoint_at->forked_inferior_pid);
+ ui_out_text (uiout, "\nCatchpoint ");
+ if (ui_out_is_mi_like_p (uiout))
+ ui_out_field_string (uiout, "reason",
+ async_reason_lookup (EXEC_ASYNC_BREAKPOINT_HIT));
+ ui_out_field_int (uiout, "bkptno", bs->breakpoint_at->number);
+ ui_out_text (uiout, " (vforked process ");
+ ui_out_field_int (uiout, "vforked-process",
+ bs->breakpoint_at->forked_inferior_pid);
+ ui_out_text (uiout, "), ");
return PRINT_SRC_AND_LOC;
break;