This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC]: Document patch for F90 derived type support

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Wu Zhou <woodzltc at cn dot ibm dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 06:37:59 +0200
Subject: Re: [RFC]: Document patch for F90 derived type support
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602240250300.7628@localhost.localdomain> <uek1t9nu6.fsf@gnu.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602262204560.9819@localhost.localdomain> <u64n0qc0l.fsf@gnu.org> <20060228135310.GA25487@nevyn.them.org> <u1wxnqmnf.fsf@gnu.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602282126040.9196@localhost.localdomain> <uek1m3gzo.fsf@gnu.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603012136550.18903@localhost.localdomain> <20060302032229.GA24353@nevyn.them.org>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 22:22:29 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> My preference is to fix the compiler rather than the debugger here; it
> should output something sensible

Again, the versions of the compiler that are already out there should
not produce wrong types in GDB, IMHO.

References:
- Re: [RFC]: Document patch for F90 derived type support
  - From: Wu Zhou
- Re: [RFC]: Document patch for F90 derived type support
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: [RFC]: Document patch for F90 derived type support
  - From: Wu Zhou
- Re: [RFC]: Document patch for F90 derived type support
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]