This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Some more multi-fork fixes
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Michael Snyder <msnyder at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:16:51 -0500
- Subject: Re: Some more multi-fork fixes
- References: <20060115190757.GA10454@nevyn.them.org> <43DA7BFE.2070100@redhat.com> <20060224224115.GA6792@nevyn.them.org> <20060224230957.GA7834@nevyn.them.org> <4411CEF7.5040601@redhat.com>
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:09:43AM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:41:15PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> >>I'm up against a bit of a brick wall at the moment. I've got
> >>patches in my source tree to unify the single-threaded and
> >>multi-threaded code in the Linux native layer into a single
> >>combined target. But since this is an inherently single-threaded
> >>operation the multi-threaded code totally falls down - switching
> >>forks doesn't preserve things like the LWP list, leading to
> >>messy timeouts. I'm going to find some minimally painful
> >>way to make the two of them talk to each other.
> >
> >
> >FYI, I've got that more or less working now (as well as it was
> >previously). I'll post it in a bit.
> >
>
> Hey Daniel, what's the status on this?
Sorry, didn't close the circle: I did post this. It's in these
two:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-02/msg00493.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-02/msg00494.html
I've still got to work out the glibc side of the fourth patch
in that series, but I don't think there's anything stopping me
from committing the others; I should do that. Does the first
one above look good to you?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery