This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC/RFA/i386] pb reading insns if breakpoints still inserted


On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 05:20:42PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Isn't this a general problem, not limited to x86?  That is, if there's
> a breakpoint inserted in the prologue, wouldn't other prologue
> analyzers be fooled?
> 
> If this is indeed a general problem, I suggest we fix it in a general
> fashion, not for some specific platform.

That's why many prologue analyzers already use the memory reading
functions which ignore breakpoints; this just improves our consistency.

Now, you could make a reasonable argument that the default when reading
memory ought to be to ignore breakpoints.  But that would be a much
harder change to test; we'd need to catch all the places which do need
to see breakpoints - I can only think of one off the top of my head,
but I'm sure there are more.  So, I would suggest making it separately.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]