This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] Strange stepping behaviour with ppc32 with secure PLTs
- From: PAUL GILLIAM <pgilliam at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:07:14 -0700
- Subject: Re: [patch] Strange stepping behaviour with ppc32 with secure PLTs
- References: <1147469935.3672.114.camel@dufur.beaverton.ibm.com> <20060512225044.GA20706@nevyn.them.org>
- Reply-to: pgilliam at us dot ibm dot com
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 18:50 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 02:38:55PM -0700, PAUL GILLIAM wrote:
. . .
> > > What do you mean by "unknown section"?
Let me retroactively rephrase my answer: "I *really* meant 'undefined'
section". 8-)
> The second patch is definitely
> incorrect. Generally any use of SECT_OFF_TEXT for something whose
> section you don't know is incorrect.
>
Not only that, but it had worse testsuite results 8-)
-=# Paul #=-