This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Update README post gdb-6.5 branch creation
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:11:44 -0400
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Update README post gdb-6.5 branch creation
- References: <20060516200632.GR4123@adacore.com>
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 01:06:32PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Now that the gdb-6.5 branch has been created, one the items that needs
> to be done is the update of the README file. Normally, it just consists
> of bumping the version number up, but in this case, I have a question.
>
> The version number currently used is gdb-6.3. In the 6.5 branch, I think
> it makes sense to have it use gdb-6.5. But in the head, I think it makes
> sense to use gdb-6.6. That way, assuming we follow the usual pattern of
> only increasing the minor version number for the next release, I don't
> have to update this file at all after I cut the gdb-6.6 branch.
>
> I therefore propose the following patch for the head:
>
> 2006-05-16 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
>
> * README: Update GDB version number.
>
> What do you guys think?
For at least the last couple of releases, this file has just gotten
sedded. Should we have a README.in instead? It would still need to be
proofread at some point on the release checklist - but GCC has adopted
a strict "version number in one place only" policy and it seems to be
quite helpful.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery