This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [commit] Cleanup display.c (and a bit of tracepoint.c too)
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 08:31:02 -0400
- Subject: Re: [commit] Cleanup display.c (and a bit of tracepoint.c too)
- References: <200607172216.k6HMGUfa023698@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <u7j2bk36w.fsf@gnu.org>
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 06:21:59AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:16:30 +0200 (CEST)
> > From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
> >
> > After inviting people to remove redundant prototypes for static
> > functions, I thought I'd set an example.
>
> Aren't there compilers out there which insist on forward declarations
> for static functions?
I surely hope not; to the best of my understanding that would be a
violation of the C standard.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery