This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: -stack-list-frames HIGH_FRAME changes
- From: Vladimir Prus <ghost at cs dot msu dot su>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 20:40:54 +0400
- Subject: Re: -stack-list-frames HIGH_FRAME changes
- References: <e3f0b0$ldg$1@sea.gmane.org> <200605051838.20652.ghost@cs.msu.su> <20060907161020.GA9198@nevyn.them.org>
On Thursday 07 September 2006 20:10, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 06:38:19PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > In any case, there's revised patch:
> >
> > ./Changelog:
> > 2006-05-05 Vladimir Prus <ghost@lvk.cs.msu.su>
> >
> > * mi/mi-cmd-stack.c (mi_cmd_stack_list_frames): Don't emit error
> > if high requested frame number is larger then number of available
> > frames.
> >
> >
> > doc/ChangeLog
> > 2006-05-05 Vladimir Prus <ghost@lvk.cs.msu.su>
> >
> > * gdb.texinfo (GDB/MI Stack Manipulation): Mention that
> > -stack-list-locals HIGH_FRAME argument can be larger then the
> > actual number of frames.
> >
> >
> > testsuite/ChangeLog
> >
> > 2006-05-05 Vladimir Prus <ghost@lvk.cs.msu.su>
> >
> > * gdb.mi/mi-stack.exp (test_stack_frame_listing): Test that
> > HIGH_FRAME argument to -stack-list-locals can be larger than
> > the number of frames.
>
> This patch is OK. Sorry for forgetting about it.
Checked in.
- Volodya