This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFC: Access TLS symbols without DWARF debuginfo
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- Cc: jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 06:27:45 +0200
- Subject: Re: RFC: Access TLS symbols without DWARF debuginfo
- References: <20060825021304.GA30225@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20060825134315.GA4994@nevyn.them.org> <20061010032226.GF22848@nevyn.them.org> <ulknokdav.fsf@gnu.org> <20061017210311.GB12643@nevyn.them.org>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:03:11 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 06:25:12AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 23:22:26 -0400
> > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> > > Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> > >
> > > Eli, this patch added support for printing thread local (__thread)
> > > variables in files without debugging information, on platforms where we
> > > could already do it with debugging information. I'm undecided on
> > > whether that's NEWS-worthy. What do you think?
> >
> > I think we should mention it in NEWS.
>
> Is this OK?
Shouldn't we mention thread-local variables explicitly, even if only
as an "e.g."?
Otherwise, fine with me. Thanks.