This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Don't give spurious warnings when using thread specific breakpoints
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:01:23PM +0100, Andrew STUBBS wrote:
> How about the attached patch which includes the one without the other?
> I've also taken the opportunity to add _() macros to a few strings.
Except that they're not useful that way :-( This should always be a
red flag:
> - : ((others == 1) ? " and" : ""));
> + : ((others == 1) ? _(" and") : ""));
There's no useful translation for " and". If you can't group the
translatable bits into whole messages, you're pretty much stuck.
Maybe Eli will have a suggestion on how to properly mark up this.
Aside from the i18n issues, this patch looks reasonable to me.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery