This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA/sparc] Fix step-bt.exp: backtrace after second instruction step

From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 08:37:32 -0800
Subject: Re: [RFA/sparc] Fix step-bt.exp: backtrace after second instruction step
References: <20061109045801.GK3582@adacore.com> <20061109130010.GA1625@nevyn.them.org>

> > I encountered on sparc the same problem I saw on i386: When scanning
> > a function prologue, if an instruction is replaced by a breakpoint,
> > we read the breakpoint instead of reading the original instruction.
> > 
> > Fixed using the same method as in i386...
> 
> OK.

Thank you. Checked in.

-- 
Joel

References:
- [RFA/sparc] Fix step-bt.exp: backtrace after second instruction step
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [RFA/sparc] Fix step-bt.exp: backtrace after second instruction step
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]