This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
Cc: Denis PILAT <denis dot pilat at st dot com>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:48:08 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking
References: <460BD630.20709@st.com> <19115.212.123.203.30.1175190093.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl>

On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 07:41:33PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >  On my native linux gdb, I get "warning: Signal ? does not exist on this
> >  system." when running.
> >  It's just a missing line in the configure of gdb.
> 
> signal.h is ISO C; we don't support systems that do not have it.

It turns out that this file is compiled for both GDB and gdbserver (a
long ago decision to try to reduce code duplication... I'm not
completely sure it was worth the hassle).  GDB definitely does not
support systems without <signal.h>, but gdbserver now tries to.  I
missed the problem when we just added WinCE support.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

References:
- [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking
  - From: Denis PILAT
- Re: [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking
  - From: Mark Kettenis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]