This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: Final(?) patch to update libtool in GCC and src trees
- From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
- To: <sje at cup dot hp dot com>, <binutils at sourceware dot org>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <gdb-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <newlib at sourceware dot org>
- Cc: <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>, <aoliva at redhat dot com>, <bonzini at gnu dot org>, <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>, <libtool at cwilson dot fastmail dot fm>, <schwab at suse dot de>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:01:56 +0100
- Subject: RE: Final(?) patch to update libtool in GCC and src trees
- References: <200704101825.LAA20541@hpsje.cup.hp.com>
On 10 April 2007 19:25, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> Here is what I hope is the final patch to update libtool in the GCC and
> src trees. I tested this on HPPA HP-UX, IA64 HP-UX, IA64 Linux, and
> X86_64 Linux. I did get a few more errors with the new libtool than the
> old.
> Other than that the testing looked good.
You don't mention any cygwin testing; did anyone else do any?
> Given these results is it OK to checkin the new libtool? I'd rather not
> wait to fix the objc problem because maintaining all these changes in
> both the GCC and src trees is a bit of a pain.
I appreciate the problem, but Cygwin can be a bit 'special' when it comes to
libtool; if it hasn't been done yet, can you possibly bear to hold off a bit
while I give it some hasty testing? (By 'a bit', I mean no more than say
'overnight'). Sorry to be a pain :-/
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....