This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: [RFA] gdb_ari.sh changes to discard some file types for specific tests
Thanks!
I have more changes, especially
related to doscheck.c
(which is not used on the web pages,
but probably should be enabled again.)
I changed the output of doscheck to
avoid getting false duplicates for files
in different directories.
The next question is for Eli, as DJGPP maintainer:
I have locally a working version of doscheck,
which avoid duplicates in different directories,
but still reveals some conflicts for DJGPP.
The most notable is
gdb/ChangeLog and gdb/ChangeLog-2006
but there are others in bfd, libdecnumber, gdb/testsuite
and other directories,
but lots of these duplicates are probably
in directories that are not even put in
the DJGPP gdb sources.
Should I send the whole list,
or should we start by updating the
directory exclusion list in update_web_ari?
By the way, is the script that
generates the DJGPP gdb source public?
If yes, where can I find it?
Pierre
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
> owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:25 PM
> To: Pierre Muller
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: [RFA] gdb_ari.sh changes to discard some file types for
> specific tests
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:41:34PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote:
> > UCASE and EditCase tests are currently polluted
> > by lex and yacc files.
> > This patch discards those bugs if the source
> > is a lex or yacc source.
> > The patch also contains the fixes for xasprintf and xvasprintf
> > that I already proposed yesterday.
> >
> > I am new to AWK scripts,
> > so I am unsure if my changes are
> > standard.
> >
> > Is this OK?
>
> I checked in something similar - we shouldn't be looking at lex/yacc
> output files at all.
>
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> CodeSourcery