This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] Parse DW_AT_ranges into PSYMTABS (for childless CU, for vDSO32)
- From: Jim Blandy <jimb at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>a
- Cc: Vladimir Prus <ghost at cs dot msu dot su>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:55:21 -0800
- Subject: Re: [patch] Parse DW_AT_ranges into PSYMTABS (for childless CU, for vDSO32)
- References: <20071009180246.GA26829@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20071009181701.GA30757@caradoc.them.org> <20071009185434.GA27810@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20071009185931.GA1220@caradoc.them.org> <20071124154339.GA14913@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <E1Iy0Vd-0006lL-64@zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su> <20071130111021.GA17867@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20071130145613.GA5941@caradoc.them.org>
Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false.org> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 12:10:21PM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>> It was not reproducible for me but the problem is Vladimir's i386 crti.S has
>> DW_AT_ranges which overlap the main code (due to its .fini part). The main
>> code full-symbols get ignored now due to it.
>>
>> Going to post a fix (try to load symtab for each matching psymtab?) and an
>> updated testcase.
>
> Jim, can we get your addrmap changes in as they are, instead of
> working on a representation change (which was the state when they were
> briefly discussed, in October)? After that, it's simple to solve this
> problem more accurately by using addrmaps for symtabs too, not just
> blocks.
Sure, if Joel doesn't object.