This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFA: patch to fix multi-breakpoint enable/disable handling of inline functions
- From: "Doug Evans" <dje at google dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 09:19:54 -0800
- Subject: Re: RFA: patch to fix multi-breakpoint enable/disable handling of inline functions
- References: <20071016001816.F059B1C7E69@localhost> <e394668d0710221422p72db9576j3f48b649215acb6d@mail.gmail.com> <fhd3rl$ufe$1@ger.gmane.org> <e394668d0711141425k6d5754abk4c27773cec419b05@mail.gmail.com> <e394668d0711141449o2e9c9b19u3d3f29a6299c936c@mail.gmail.com> <e394668d0711261522s32aff5a6h3b00aa52b76a304c@mail.gmail.com>
On Nov 26, 2007 3:22 PM, Douglas Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
> How about this version?
>
> Here I use libiberty/hashtab.c to determine function name ambiguity.
>
> It turns out the bug exists for constructors too. I.e.
> l->function_name for "Derived" in the gdb.cp/mb-ctor testcase is
> "Derived" for both locations. I wonder if for this particular
> situation l->function_name should record an "enhanced" name to
> distinguish them.
Ping.