This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ping: [RFA/testsuite] ptype of structs with anonymous type fields

From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 09:29:47 +0400
Subject: Re: ping: [RFA/testsuite] ptype of structs with anonymous type fields
References: <20070828175128.GC3874@adacore.com> <20071221062750.GL6154@adacore.com> <20071221132016.GA22218@caradoc.them.org>

> > Do we agree that this is the expected behavior? If yes, then I think
> > I can commit the testsuite change, since this part is relatively
> > straightforward.  But I want to make sure that we do have the correct
> > behavior!
> 
> Expected, certainly.  Test looks fine to me.

Cool, thanks for confirming it.  I checked the patch in.

-- 
Joel

References:
- ping: [RFA/testsuite] ptype of structs with anonymous type fields
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: ping: [RFA/testsuite] ptype of structs with anonymous type fields
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]