This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] lmemmem.patch
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 19:44:53 -0400
- Subject: Re: [RFA] lmemmem.patch
- References: <200803241758.m2OHwDid017265@greed.delorie.com> <e394668d0803241333nedb753j9b7b1593c6d3989f@mail.gmail.com> <20080324203738.GC29991@ins.uni-bonn.de> <e394668d0803241346h5006b63du8997cf9e081dc907@mail.gmail.com> <20080324205119.GE29991@ins.uni-bonn.de> <e394668d0803241420w3db1813bj4aa7803b74f3d40b@mail.gmail.com> <20080324212354.GA16323@caradoc.them.org> <e394668d0803241436w5160a2dfodd33d44b174cb9bf@mail.gmail.com> <20080330213540.GA2856@caradoc.them.org> <e394668d0804091517r612a1f0bx5a06c816d26ce40c@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 03:17:05PM -0700, Doug Evans wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
> > Here you go. How does this look? It frees us to rely on gnulib's
> > stdint.h, string.h, and other useful modules should we want them. I
> > didn't make gdbserver completely use gnulib, only build memmem; I
> > tested this on Linux (memmem present) and Windows (memmem missing).
> > GDB will use the included memmem even on Linux, since glibc's is known
> > to be slower.
>
> Hi. Can you check this in?
Yeah, sorry. Not having seen any objections, I will do so (tomorrow
morning).
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery