This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC] Using bt command in async mode
A Thursday 10 April 2008 16:22:36, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Daniel> Seems like this will be just as awkward in the long term, but
> Daniel> it's an improvement.
> Is there some other approach you'd prefer?
The approach I though of following would be to
do it explicitly in each command, given that we
may have commands that may apply to another thread
not the current one in non-stop mode, prohibiting those
commands early may be wrong.
Something similar to ERROR_NO_INFERIOR.
I'm not sure we're settled on --thread or not, so
I didn't come forward with this.