This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] exec_cleanup murder.
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 02:14:01PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>> What I propose is:
>> - continuation is the only mechanism for running code after the target
>> stops. A continuation callback gets extra parameter that tells if
>> an error is occurred. If this parameter is true, the continuation
>> just cleans up, and does not do any regular processing it would do on
> This sounds good. But could you please name the argument error_p,
> not error? As it is, it's shadowing the global function "error".
> It's a shame that the logic of what to clean up ends up in two places
> now. But it's better than before.
>> @@ -168,9 +168,11 @@ mi_interpreter_prompt_p (void *data)
>> static void
>> -mi_interpreter_exec_continuation (struct continuation_arg *arg)
>> +mi_interpreter_exec_continuation (struct continuation_arg *arg, int error)
> Two spaces...
> I don't see any other problems with the patch, so it's OK with those
Checked in, thanks.