This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC][patch 0/9] Python support in GDB
On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 06:21 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> I understand the urge to avoid unnecessary work. That is why I said
> _minimal_ documentation. I find it hard to believe that nothing can
> be said about this feature that will not change based on further
Oh, I see. Yes, it's perfectly reasonable.
> Unless all that discussion happens before the patches are
> committed to the GDB CVS, in which case I have no problems waiting
> till then. But whenever the patches are actually committed, I will
> object to doing so without some minimal documentation that describes
> its usage.
I'm inclined to take this approach. At the moment I prefer to see what
folks will say about the current implementation, and when at least one
of these patches is ready to be committed I'll include documentation to
go with it.
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center