This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Implement *running.

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: drow at false dot org, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 20:45:18 +0300
Subject: Re: [RFA] Implement *running.
References: <200805011735.52447.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200805041837.44909.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <u8wypx6d0.fsf@gnu.org> <200805111757.45980.vladimir@codesourcery.com>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 17:57:45 +0400
> Cc: drow@false.org,
>  gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> How about this wording:
> 
>   The frontend should not assume that this notification is output
>   only once for any command.  @value{GDBN} may emit this notification 
>   several times, either for different threads, because it cannot resume
>   all threads together, or even for a single thread, if the thread must
>   be stepped though some code before letting it run freely.

Fine with me, thanks.

References:
- [RFA] Implement *running.
  - From: Vladimir Prus
- Re: [RFA] Implement *running.
  - From: Vladimir Prus
- Re: [RFA] Implement *running.
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: [RFA] Implement *running.
  - From: Vladimir Prus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]