Re: [rfc/rft] Update remaining targets to value-based unwinding

[DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>]

> I'm not suggesting to commit this right now; but if anyone has access
> to one of the targets converted by this patch, I'd certainly welcome
> test reports.

These are all sim-based results:

iq2000:

# of expected passes            10025
# of unexpected failures        109
# of expected failures          40
# of known failures             52
# of unresolved testcases       2
# of untested testcases         22
# of unsupported tests          72


m32c (two multilibs):

# of expected passes            17068
# of unexpected failures        2758
# of expected failures          80
# of known failures             134
# of unresolved testcases       584
# of untested testcases         22
# of unsupported tests          146


v850:

# of expected passes            9866
# of unexpected failures        262
# of unexpected successes       3
# of expected failures          50
# of known failures             35
# of untested testcases         11
# of unsupported tests          72