This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Another annotation for threads

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Cc: Nick Roberts <nickrob at snap dot net dot nz>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 22:29:58 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Another annotation for threads
References: <18483.36546.101715.670386@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080605193017.GF25085@caradoc.them.org> <18504.22662.394416.990603@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080605212615.GA6969@caradoc.them.org> <18504.35208.397231.7949@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <m3iqwnbcdz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 07:06:16PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Is this how things "ought" to work?  I mean ideally?

Yes.  But there was disagreement over when a particular observer
ought to be called.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Another annotation for threads
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Another annotation for threads
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [PATCH] Another annotation for threads
  - From: Nick Roberts
- Re: [PATCH] Another annotation for threads
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [PATCH] Another annotation for threads
  - From: Nick Roberts
- Re: [PATCH] Another annotation for threads
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]