This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: --with-pkgversion and --with-bugurl support for GDB
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: drow at false dot org, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:19:32 +0300
- Subject: Re: --with-pkgversion and --with-bugurl support for GDB
- References: <Pine.LNX.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <Pine.LNX.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <Pine.LNX.email@example.com> <20080605202431.GK25085@caradoc.them.org> <Pine.LNX.firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 21:28:15 +0000 (UTC)
> From: "Joseph S. Myers" <email@example.com>
> cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
> +static void
> +gdbreplay_version (void)
> + printf ("GNU gdbreplay %s%s\n"
> + "Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.\n"
> + "gdbserver is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License.\n"
> + "This gdbserver was configured as \"%s\"\n",
> + PKGVERSION, version, host_name);
We start by announcing a "GNU gdbreplay", but thereafter talk about
"gdbserver". Is that right? Shouldn't we either (1) use gdbreplay
throughout, or (2) say something like "GNU gdbreplay (gdbserver %s%s)"?