This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfc/rft] Update remaining targets to value-based unwinding
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
- Cc: uweigand at de dot ibm dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:42:57 -0400
- Subject: Re: [rfc/rft] Update remaining targets to value-based unwinding
- References: <200805182015.m4IKFQmx030794@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <20080529164003.GB11646@caradoc.them.org> <200805291645.m4TGjCRu006229@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 06:45:12PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 12:40:03 -0400
> > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> >
> > On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 10:15:25PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > Hi Ulrich,
> >
> > At this point I think you've gotten all the likely testing; is it time
> > to commit this?
>
> I'm already looking at m88k; if you commit it Ulrich, can you leave
> that bit out?
Mark, did you have a chance to finish m88k? Ulrich, how do you feel
about committing the non-m88k bits now? Or I can take care of it if
that's easier.
I'm working on removing some warts from the version of inlined
function support I posted. This requires careful reasoning about each
of the frame_*_unwind and frame_unwind_* methods, which is much easier
when they are not used in any unwinders; so I'm working from a tree
with Ulrich's patch applied.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery