This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[RFA/testsuite] stack check
- From: Jerome Guitton <guitton at adacore dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 12:52:15 +0200
- Subject: [RFA/testsuite] stack check
Follow-up to http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-09/msg00007.html
Test that the different possible stack checking sequences are properly
skipped when analyzing a prologue on PPC AIX.
OK to apply?
2008-09-05 Jerome Guitton <guitton@adacore.com>
* powerpc-aix-prologue.c (stack_check_probe_1, stack_check_probe_2)
(stack_check_probe_loop_1, stack_check_probe_loop_2): New functions.
(main): Add call to these new functions.
* powerpc-aix-prologue.exp: When breaking on these functions, check
that the breakpoint is inserted at the appropriate location.
(insert_breakpoint): Slightly refine this procedure so that it can
be called several times in the test.
Thanks,
Jerome
Index: testsuite/gdb.arch/powerpc-aix-prologue.exp
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gdb.arch/powerpc-aix-prologue.exp (revision 134842)
+++ testsuite/gdb.arch/powerpc-aix-prologue.exp (working copy)
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ proc insert_breakpoint {function expecte
# Insert a breakpoint using the given function name, and extract
# the breakpoint address for the output.
gdb_test_multiple "break $function" "set breakpoint in $function" {
- -re "Breakpoint 1 at ($hex).*$gdb_prompt $" {
+ -re "Breakpoint .* at ($hex).*$gdb_prompt $" {
set address $expect_out(1,string)
}
default {
@@ -79,3 +79,8 @@ proc insert_breakpoint {function expecte
}
insert_breakpoint "li_stw" 12
+insert_breakpoint "stack_check_probe_1" 16
+insert_breakpoint "stack_check_probe_2" 40
+insert_breakpoint "stack_check_probe_loop_1" 68
+insert_breakpoint "stack_check_probe_loop_2" 60
+
Index: testsuite/gdb.arch/powerpc-aix-prologue.c
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gdb.arch/powerpc-aix-prologue.c (revision 134842)
+++ testsuite/gdb.arch/powerpc-aix-prologue.c (working copy)
@@ -17,10 +17,19 @@
void li_stw (void);
+void stack_check_probe_1 (void);
+void stack_check_probe_2 (void);
+void stack_check_probe_loop_1 (void);
+void stack_check_probe_loop_2 (void);
+
int
main (void)
{
li_stw ();
+ stack_check_probe_1 ();
+ stack_check_probe_2 ();
+ stack_check_probe_loop_1 ();
+ stack_check_probe_loop_2 ();
return 0;
}
@@ -51,3 +60,125 @@ asm (" .csect .text[PR]\n"
" lwz 31,-4(1)\n"
" blr\n");
+/* Asm for procedure stack_check_probe_1().
+
+ The purpose of this function is to verify that GDB can skip the stack
+ checking probing at the beginning of the prologue. */
+
+asm (" .csect .text[PR]\n"
+ " .align 2\n"
+ " .globl stack_check_probe_1\n"
+ " .globl .stack_check_probe_1\n"
+ " .csect stack_check_probe_1[DS]\n"
+ "stack_check_probe_1:\n"
+ " .long .stack_check_probe_1, TOC[tc0], 0\n"
+ " .csect .text[PR]\n"
+ ".stack_check_probe_1:\n"
+ " stw 0,-12336(1)\n"
+ " stw 31,-4(1)\n"
+ " stwu 1,-48(1)\n"
+ " mr 31,1\n"
+ " lwz 1,0(1)\n"
+ " lwz 31,-4(1)\n"
+ " blr\n");
+
+/* Asm for procedure stack_check_probe_2 ().
+
+ Similar to stack_check_probe_1, but with a different probing sequence
+ (several probes). */
+
+asm (" .csect .text[PR]\n"
+ " .align 2\n"
+ " .globl stack_check_probe_2\n"
+ " .globl .stack_check_probe_2\n"
+ " .csect stack_check_probe_2[DS]\n"
+ "stack_check_probe_2:\n"
+ " .long .stack_check_probe_2, TOC[tc0], 0\n"
+ " .csect .text[PR]\n"
+ ".stack_check_probe_2:\n"
+ " stw 0,-16384(1)\n"
+ " stw 0,-20480(1)\n"
+ " stw 0,-24576(1)\n"
+ " stw 0,-28672(1)\n"
+ " stw 0,-28752(1)\n"
+ " mflr 0\n"
+ " stw 31,-4(1)\n"
+ " stw 0,8(1)\n"
+ " stwu 1,-16464(1)\n"
+ " mr 31,1\n"
+ " lwz 1,0(1)\n"
+ " lwz 0,8(1)\n"
+ " mtlr 0\n"
+ " lwz 31,-4(1)\n"
+ " blr\n");
+
+/* Asm for procedure stack_check_probe_loop_1() and stack_check_probe_loop_2().
+
+ Similar to stack_check_probe_1, but with a different probing sequence
+ (probing loop). */
+
+asm (" .csect .text[PR]\n"
+ " .align 2\n"
+ " .globl stack_check_probe_loop_1\n"
+ " .globl .stack_check_probe_loop_1\n"
+ " .csect stack_check_probe_loop_1[DS]\n"
+ "stack_check_probe_loop_1:\n"
+ " .long .stack_check_probe_loop_1, TOC[tc0], 0\n"
+ " .csect .text[PR]\n"
+ ".stack_check_probe_loop_1:\n"
+ " addi 12,1,-12288\n"
+ " lis 0,-8\n"
+ " ori 0,0,4096\n"
+ " add 0,12,0\n"
+ "LPSRL1..0:\n"
+ " cmpw 0,12,0\n"
+ " beq 0,LPSRE1..0\n"
+ " addi 12,12,-4096\n"
+ " stw 0,0(12)\n"
+ " b LPSRL1..0\n"
+ "LPSRE1..0:\n"
+ " stw 0,-4080(12)\n"
+ " mflr 0\n"
+ " stw 31,-4(1)\n"
+ " stw 0,8(1)\n"
+ " lis 0,0xfff8\n"
+ " ori 0,0,16\n"
+ " stwux 1,1,0\n"
+ " mr 31,1\n"
+ " lwz 1,0(1)\n"
+ " lwz 0,8(1)\n"
+ " mtlr 0\n"
+ " lwz 31,-4(1)\n"
+ " blr\n");
+
+asm (" .csect .text[PR]\n"
+ " .align 2\n"
+ " .globl stack_check_probe_loop_2\n"
+ " .globl .stack_check_probe_loop_2\n"
+ " .csect stack_check_probe_loop_2[DS]\n"
+ "stack_check_probe_loop_2:\n"
+ " .long .stack_check_probe_loop_2, TOC[tc0], 0\n"
+ " .csect .text[PR]\n"
+ ".stack_check_probe_loop_2:\n"
+ " addi 12,1,-12288\n"
+ " lis 0,-8\n"
+ " add 0,12,0\n"
+ "LPSRL2..0:\n"
+ " cmpw 0,12,0\n"
+ " beq 0,LPSRE2..0\n"
+ " addi 12,12,-4096\n"
+ " stw 0,0(12)\n"
+ " b LPSRL2..0\n"
+ "LPSRE2..0:\n"
+ " mflr 0\n"
+ " stw 31,-4(1)\n"
+ " stw 0,8(1)\n"
+ " lis 0,0xfff8\n"
+ " ori 0,0,16\n"
+ " stwux 1,1,0\n"
+ " mr 31,1\n"
+ " lwz 1,0(1)\n"
+ " lwz 0,8(1)\n"
+ " mtlr 0\n"
+ " lwz 31,-4(1)\n"
+ " blr\n");