This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfc] [11/18] Cell multi-arch: Target description <compatible> infrastructure
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:24:13 +0300
- Subject: Re: [rfc] [11/18] Cell multi-arch: Target description <compatible> infrastructure
- References: <200809081145.m88Bj171030625@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:45:01 +0200 (CEST)
> From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > > +@var{arch} is an architecture name from the same selection
> > > +accepted by @code{set architecture} (@pxref{Targets, ,Specifying a
> > > +Debugging Target}).
> >
> > I don't understand the purpose of "the same" here. Same as what?
>
> This element accepts the same set of architecture names as the set
> accepted by the "set architecture" command.
Then I suggest to rephrase:
+@var{arch} is one of the architectures from the set accepted by
+@code{set architecture} (@pxref{Targets, ,Specifying a Debugging
+Target}).
> The wording I've used is copied above is copied from the description
> of the <architecture> element
Please fix that one as well.
> See below for an updated patch.
Thanks, this is fine (with the above wording change).