This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Resubmit, reverse debugging [0/5]


Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 02:58:06PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
OK, here's a patch that adds
  1) remote protocol documentation
  2) The requested extension to the 'T' reply to replace E06
  3) A big honking "deprecated" warning for E06.

I'm even fine with the warning being replaced by a comment. The most important part, IMO, is having a non-hackish version of the protocol implemented and documented.

All right, so that's in.


We also discussed earlier the idea of a capability check,
or like a qSupported message.  Are we going to make that a
requirement before this patch can go in?  Or can it be added
as a subsequent, incremental improvement?

And are there any more requirements before this patch can go in?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]