This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Convenience functions
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Rob Quill <rob dot quill at gmail dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:15:52 -0600
- Subject: Re: Convenience functions
- References: <baf6008d0801181443s5321e5d5ud1c935aa8487a549@mail.gmail.com> <m34pda7ira.fsf@codesourcery.com> <baf6008d0801300405i47646b05pdb799d32ab71e005@mail.gmail.com> <u1w7zxjid.fsf@gnu.org> <8f2776cb0801301557t2e265b62u56d6df7cbcec1c84@mail.gmail.com> <utzkuws6q.fsf@gnu.org> <baf6008d0807271645o7d03dd94rd5b3f0d08302085a@mail.gmail.com> <m38wvk77qd.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <baf6008d0807291404x255213b7id79efc6939d92eb1@mail.gmail.com> <m3bq0g59md.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20081023134150.GA21234@caradoc.them.org>
- Reply-to: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
Daniel> [Preachy interlude: splitting up patches good! posting unrelated
Daniel> patches at the bottom of threads bad! Until Tom mentioned it on IRC
Daniel> this week I'd completely forgotten this patch had been posted.]
Yeah, well... I sent this as a convenience to Rob, not as a real
submission. It isn't actually useful for anything in this form.
Daniel> I looked through this patch, since I have another use for it too. It
Daniel> looks fine to me, except that of course it is missing documentation
Daniel> and test cases. For test cases we'd need a function to test with;
Daniel> perhaps Rob's?
Exactly :)
Tom