This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: reverse for GDB/MI
> > Also, changing to variants would require rewriting code that we already
> > have in place and hvae tested (at least to some extent), and doing that
> > always strikes me as inviting problems and extra work.
>
> Well, I don't remember that the design for MI reverse support was ever posted
> to this list. If it were, you'd receive these comments before writing the code
> :-)
The patch for the MI commands was the implementation I mention, and it seems that it has been used by Teawater as well for some kind of testing. We have also tested them out and used them for a quite a while, as a patch to gdb used with Simics. So in that sense, the MI commands are not newly invented, but rather a commit of something that we have been using for a few years already.
Best regards,
/jakob
_______________________________________________________
Jakob Engblom, PhD, Technical Marketing Manager
Virtutech Direct: +46 8 690 07 47
DrottningholmsvÃgen 22 Mobile: +46 709 242 646
11243 Stockholm Web: www.virtutech.com
Sweden
________________________________________________________