This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] Fix `return' of long/long-long results with no debuginfo


On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:22:41 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
# I disagree.  I think it is the behaviour that makes the most sense in
# a historical context.  And I have a (somewhat) vague recollection that

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:57:51 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Sorry Jan, are you really just ignoring my remarks and actually making
> this diff more unacceptable to me?

I cannot agree GDB should prefer to simulate the K&R C behavior over ANSI/ISO
C behavior.  Sure I do not have the approval right so I will do anything I am
told with the patch to check it in.  Still FYI so far I has not been convinced
to change my opinion on this (K&R vs. ANSI/ISO C) specific subject.

I am sorry if spending the time to read my patch was not acceptable for you.


Regards,
Jan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]