This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-next" command error
- From: teawater <teawater at gmail dot com>
- To: Marc Khouzam <marc dot khouzam at ericsson dot com>
- Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder at vmware dot com>, Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 14:11:44 +0800
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-next" command error
- References: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA04E1BF2D@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA06D3416B@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> <daef60380901292011y62875b4fv5aeda9e2359a7dd0@mail.gmail.com> <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA06E85695@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se>
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-03/msg00005.html
This is the patch for this bug.
Thanks,
Hui
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 03:55, Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> From: teawater [mailto:teawater@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 11:12 PM
>> To: Marc Khouzam
>> Cc: Michael Snyder; Pedro Alves; gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>> Subject: Re: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-next" command error
>>
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> Could you please send more message about your issue?
>> >
>> > I just noticed I still have the problem of jumping library functions
>> > when using reverse-step. ?Seems ok for reverse-next.
>> >
>
> Was this still in my court? ?Sorry about that.
> Here is how I reproduced the problem:
>
>
> GNU gdb (GDB) 6.8.50.20090113-cvs
> Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later
> <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
> There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. ?Type "show
> copying"
> and "show warranty" for details.
> This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-linux-gnu".
> For bug reporting instructions, please see:
> <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>...
> (gdb) l
> 1 ? ? ? #include <stdio.h>
> 2 ? ? ? int main()
> 3 ? ? ? {
> 4 ? ? ? ? ? char* cptr = "Thread 1";
> 5 ? ? ? ? ? int b[2] = {5,8};
> 6 ? ? ? ? ? b[0] = 6; ? b[1] = 9;
> 7 ? ? ? ? ? printf("Thread 1, loop \n");
> 8 ? ? ? ? ? printf("Thread 2, loop \n");
> 9 ? ? ? ? ? printf("Thread 3, loop \n");
> 10 ? ? ? ? ?return 1;
> (gdb) b main
> Breakpoint 1 at 0x8048485: file a.cc, line 4.
> (gdb) r
> Starting program: /local/home/lmckhou/testing/a.out
>
> Breakpoint 1, main () at a.cc:4
> 4 ? ? ? ? ? char* cptr = "Thread 1";
> (gdb) record
> (gdb) n
> 5 ? ? ? ? ? int b[2] = {5,8};
> (gdb)
> 6 ? ? ? ? ? b[0] = 6; ? b[1] = 9;
> (gdb)
> 7 ? ? ? ? ? printf("Thread 1, loop \n");
> (gdb)
> Thread 1, loop
> 8 ? ? ? ? ? printf("Thread 2, loop \n");
> (gdb)
> Thread 2, loop
> 9 ? ? ? ? ? printf("Thread 3, loop \n");
> (gdb)
> Thread 3, loop
> 10 ? ? ? ? ?return 1;
> (gdb) rs
> 9 ? ? ? ? ? printf("Thread 3, loop \n");
> (gdb)
> 8 ? ? ? ? ? printf("Thread 2, loop \n");
> (gdb)
>
> No more reverse-execution history. ? ? <===== What about lines 7, 6, 5?
> main () at a.cc:4
> 4 ? ? ? ? ? char* cptr = "Thread 1";
>
>