This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] disassemble-next-line


I had check the new patch in.

2009-03-17  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>

	* stack.c: Change the introduce of "disassemble-next-line".

2009-03-17  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>

	* gdb.texinfo: Change the introduce of "disassemble-next-line".

Thanks,
Hui

On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 13:26, teawater <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry Eli,
>
> I had checked-in the old patch because I understand your meaning of
> "Everything is OK" mistake.
> I will commit your words to cvs.
>
> Thanks,
> Hui
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:14, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>>> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:17:16 +0800
>>> From: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>, tromey@redhat.com, pedro@codesourcery.com,
>>> ? ? ? drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>>>
>>> I think pc address doesn't have line info have 2 reasons:
>>>
>>> 1. ?Compile without -g
>>> 2. ?Some code doesn't have line info. ?for example: plt code, lib code.
>>
>> OK. ?In that case, I suggest the following rewording:
>>
>> ?If AUTO (which is the default), or there's no line info to determine
>> ?the source line of the next instruction, display disassembly of next
>> ?instruction instead.
>>
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]