This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Submit process record and replay fourth time, 7/8

From: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Cc: Hui Zhu <teawater at gmail dot com>, Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>, marc dot khouzam at ericsson dot com, msnyder at vmware dot com, bauerman at br dot ibm dot com, eliz at gnu dot org, paawan1982 at yahoo dot com
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:47:09 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFA] Submit process record and replay fourth time, 7/8
References: <daef60380903210903tc7981bu8a77ef6a30d1b982@mail.gmail.com> <daef60380903220859h28af500bl14d8be4ce43e8f5c@mail.gmail.com> <daef60380903220943s71a8c492kc6e5f7dc8c66d6cc@mail.gmail.com>

On Sunday 22 March 2009 16:43:36, Hui Zhu wrote:
> About this part, I think it again. ?I think keep it to macro is
> better. ?Because all of values can't be change. ?Set them to variable
> just to make record linux code more friendly to other arch. ?So I
> think make it to macro is more clear.

I don't think it's clearer at all.  I think it's just clutter.

-- 
Pedro Alves

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA] Submit process record and replay fourth time, 7/8
  - From: Hui Zhu
- Re: [RFA] Submit process record and replay fourth time, 7/8
  - From: Mark Kettenis

References:
- [RFA] Submit process record and replay fourth time, 7/8
  - From: Hui Zhu
- Re: [RFA] Submit process record and replay fourth time, 7/8
  - From: Hui Zhu
- Re: [RFA] Submit process record and replay fourth time, 7/8
  - From: Hui Zhu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]