This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Special casing dtors?

From: Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:24:23 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFC] Special casing dtors?
References: <49CAB139.8010100@redhat.com> <200903301658.16807.pedro@codesourcery.com> <49D3FCC9.7090505@redhat.com> <200904072154.45602.pedro@codesourcery.com>

Pedro Alves wrote:

Since this stabs patch in now in HEAD, I've redone the testing.  I
confirm that with this patch installed, your original patch doesn't
introduce any new failures on the templates.exp test on
stabs --- gcc 4.2, or head.  Yay!

Phew! I was (really) worried there for a moment! :-)

PS. I still don't understand how you are getting DWARF2 failures. I've run these tests on gcc 4.2.0, 4.2.4, 4.3.2, and 4.4.0, and NONE of those compilers demonstrate any failures after the patch; they all fail BEFORE the patch is applied. I guess I'll deal with this next.
This must be a miscomunication.  I never said I was getting DWARF
failures.  I just re-confirmed that your original patch does remove
the dtors kfail in templates.exp on dwarf.

Ok, I must have misread your message -- my mind was quite overtaxed with all the testing and running through the debug info and whatnot whilst working on evaluating the stabs problems.

Once again, thank you for taking the time to investigate this so thoroughly.

Keith

References:
- Re: [RFC] Special casing dtors?
  - From: Keith Seitz
- Re: [RFC] Special casing dtors?
  - From: Pedro Alves

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]