This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Use data cache for stack accesses

From: Jacob Potter <jdpotter at google dot com>
To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Cc: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:16:39 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFA] Use data cache for stack accesses
References: <7e6c8d660907081308r13bff580rdcf4822c77df8403@mail.gmail.com> <20090708205140.GA2926@caradoc.them.org> <7e6c8d660907091659l7db08484xf3aa6bb3f33f1a5e@mail.gmail.com> <200907101033.29377.pedro@codesourcery.com>

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Pedro Alves<pedro@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> You can't do that unconditionaly. ?struct inferior's are mostly a
> process_stratum and inferior control entity: it is an internal error to
> call it when there's no current inferior (but note that it is still valid
> to read memory from the executable).

OK, how's this look? I've:
- moved target_dcache to be in struct inferior
- added documentation on the flag changes to gdb.texinfo

- Jacob

Attachment: part2-use-cache-for-stack.patch.txt
Description: Text document

References:
- [RFA] Use data cache for stack accesses
  - From: Jacob Potter
- Re: [RFA] Use data cache for stack accesses
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [RFA] Use data cache for stack accesses
  - From: Jacob Potter
- Re: [RFA] Use data cache for stack accesses
  - From: Pedro Alves

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]