This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Bug in i386_process_record?


> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:53:20 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, msnyder@vmware.com,
> 	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> If I remember correctly, the %es that GDB sees is the selector rather
> than the base address.

Yes, at least in the DJGPP Port, that's so.

> I think any halfway recent Linux kernel exposes both values, but GDB
> doesn't display the bases - this probably bears fixing!

There's a system call in DJGPP to get the base address; see "info
dos".


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]