This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Bug in i386_process_record?

> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:58:39 +0800
> Cc: msnyder@vmware.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> I add some code about it:
>           regcache_raw_read_unsigned (ir.regcache,
>                                       ir.regmap[X86_RECORD_ES_REGNUM],
>                                       &es);
>           regcache_raw_read_unsigned (ir.regcache,
>                                       ir.regmap[X86_RECORD_DS_REGNUM],
>                                       &ds);
>           if (ir.aflag && (es != ds))
>             {
> 
> After that, we will not get the warning because the es is same with ds
> in user level.
> 
> What do you think about it?

Sounds good to me.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]