On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 05:15, Joel Brobecker<brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
I could suggest casting it to (unsigned int), but it wouldn't
really make any difference, would it? Mark -- Jiang -- would
that make you guys more comfortable?
Short term, I'd rather see us read the syscall number as a signed
number since this is what record_linux_system_call expects. We can
decide whether to rationalize as a signed or unsigned as a separate
patch. I think Mark was OK with the patch I sent yesterday, except
that he said we should add a check against negative values.
There is also a cast that is unnecessary in the error message.
Hui can use %s/paddress rather than %d/cast.
--
Joel
Hi guys,
I make a new patch according to your comment.
Thanks,
Hui
2009-09-06 Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
* i386-linux-tdep.c (i386_linux_intx80_sysenter_record): Change
regcache_raw_read to regcache_raw_read_signed.
Index: i386-linux-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/i386-linux-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.66
diff -u -p -r1.66 i386-linux-tdep.c
--- i386-linux-tdep.c 10 Aug 2009 03:04:44 -0000 1.66
+++ i386-linux-tdep.c 6 Sep 2009 02:12:15 -0000
@@ -367,18 +367,19 @@ static int
i386_linux_intx80_sysenter_record (struct regcache *regcache)
{
int ret;
- uint32_t tmpu32;
+ LONGEST syscall;
- regcache_raw_read (regcache, I386_EAX_REGNUM, (gdb_byte *) &tmpu32);
+ regcache_raw_read_signed (regcache, I386_EAX_REGNUM, &syscall);
- if (tmpu32 > 499)
+ if (syscall < 0 || syscall > 499)
{
printf_unfiltered (_("Process record and replay target doesn't "
- "support syscall number %u\n"), tmpu32);
+ "support syscall number %s\n"),
+ plongest (syscall));
return -1;
}
- ret = record_linux_system_call (tmpu32, regcache,
+ ret = record_linux_system_call (syscall, regcache,
&i386_linux_record_tdep);
if (ret)
return ret;