This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Build question
- From: Danny Backx <danny dot backx at scarlet dot be>
- To: tromey at redhat dot com
- Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:31:53 +0200
- Subject: Re: Build question
- References: <1250803105.11282.96.camel@pavilion> <m3fxbl2jib.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83d46pgjkq.fsf@gnu.org> <1250877901.11282.116.camel@pavilion> <83ab1tgh9h.fsf@gnu.org> <1250880746.11282.128.camel@pavilion> <m3r5v425lu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <1250931899.11282.142.camel@pavilion> <83skfkfa4n.fsf@gnu.org> <1251095160.16357.352.camel@pavilion> <1251828295.6106.119.camel@pavilion> <83zl9e8nro.fsf@gnu.org> <1251835928.6106.124.camel@pavilion> <83vdk281xb.fsf@gnu.org> <1252143311.6106.252.camel@pavilion> <83eiql4blw.fsf@gnu.org> <1252440932.6106.336.camel@pavilion> <m3skevq4b7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
- Reply-to: danny dot backx at scarlet dot be
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 13:57 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Danny" == Danny Backx <danny.backx@scarlet.be> writes:
> Danny> Index: include/filenames.h
>
> include is part of libiberty, so you'll need approval from the libiberty
> maintainers.
>
> Given that more programs than gdb use BFD and libiberty, you will at the
> very least need to put have_dos_based_file_system elsewhere (i.e., in
> libiberty).
Who are the libiberty maintainers ? Is this part of another GNU
project ?
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info