Re: Another proposal for frontends and queries.

[Hui Zhu <teawater at gmail dot com>]

>> >
>> >
>> > How is precord different?
>> >
>> > We very seriously need a GDB HIG.
>> >
>> > --
>>
>> There is a patch to handle it. ?I think this way is better. And I have
>> said :"If you really cannot handle query with Eclipse, I think this
>> patch is OK with me. "
>
> Yes but some of the maintainers did not really like this solution.
>
>> BTW, I told Marc begin a new thread to discussion why Eclipse cannot
>> handle nquery. ?What's happen?
>
> This thread we're in now is this new thread you suggested.
> I tried to summarize the issue and go over all the different proposals
> (we are up to 4 different solutions). ?My impression is that the maintainers
> prefer to change PRecord (which is new) instead of changing the genereal
> GDB behaviour with respect to queries (which has been there for a long time).
>

Thanks for help me clear what happen.   Thanks a lot.

And about the patch I said can handle this issue is "set record query
<on|off>" patch.  I cannot find who don't like this patch.

On the other hand, about the nquery.
Let me talk my idea.  The nquery is a function of GDB right?  MI is a
function of GDB too.   Eclipse is a very important soft that support
GDB.
If you want change nquery to query, why not remove nquery directly?


Thanks,
Hui