This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] Set calling convention of methods
- From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jonas Maebe <jonas dot maebe at elis dot ugent dot be>, Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:32:30 -0700
- Subject: Re: [patch] Set calling convention of methods
- References: <7B6EF4DA-76C8-4D9C-8B9F-94153EF1C4E1@elis.ugent.be> <m3zleb2ne3.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <691B0BA8-C606-42FF-A796-76CC9C31556A@elis.ugent.be> <200904222215.n3MMF0p2006994@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <19C107AA-5271-4C23-A6D2-AFF75BBAC4E4@elis.ugent.be> <m3bpp3oode.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <5AA3BCA9-1ECF-446E-8B49-3132F0E470FB@elis.ugent.be> <20090930000225.GA10338@adacore.com> <8F3B6095-4766-432D-ABB5-AB4DAA2D5572@elis.ugent.be> <m3bpks5qiw.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
> Jonas> Later on, Tom clarified that he thought that the gdb and gcc versions
> Jonas> of dwarf2.h should actually be merged into a single copy, but that I
> Jonas> shouldn't worry about this since the divergence started before my
> Jonas> patch: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-04/msg00099.html
>
> I've merged these now.
>
> I think the usual approach for such merged files is that GCC is the
> master copy.
Confirmed. It's written plain as day in the header. The sticky part
is that Jonas does NOT have copyright assignment on file for GCC, as
far as I can tell...
--
Joel