Re: [patch] Set calling convention of methods

[Jonas Maebe <jonas dot maebe at elis dot ugent dot be>]

On 30 Sep 2009, at 19:32, Joel Brobecker wrote:

> > Jonas> Later on, Tom clarified that he thought that the gdb and gcc  
> > versions
> > Jonas> of dwarf2.h should actually be merged into a single copy,  
> > but that I
> > Jonas> shouldn't worry about this since the divergence started  
> > before my
> > Jonas> patch: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-04/msg00099.html
> >
> > I've merged these now.
> >
> > I think the usual approach for such merged files is that GCC is the
> > master copy.
>
> Confirmed. It's written plain as day in the header.  The sticky part
> is that Jonas does NOT have copyright assignment on file for GCC, as
> far as I can tell...

I've pinged my dwarf2.h thrice on the gcc-patches list in the mean  
time (always inline, because it doesn't contain any lines >= 80  
chars), the last time mentioning that I now also have a copyright  
assignment on file for GCC. I haven received so much as an  
acknowledgment.

Here's the last ping I did: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-10/msg01788.html 
 (it's only from Friday, but given my past experiences, I don't  
expect it suddenly to be picked up after getting buried under a couple  
days extra mail).

I don't know what else to do.


Jonas