This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: Fix "break *EXP thread NUM"

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, Andrew Stubbs <ams at codesourcery dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at codesourcery dot com>, Vladimir Prus <vladimir at codesourcery dot com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:43:03 -0500
Subject: Re: RFC: Fix "break *EXP thread NUM"
References: <20091123212736.GA3828@caradoc.them.org> <4B0BB652.3080303@codesourcery.com> <20091124142406.GA14875@caradoc.them.org> <20091124145422.GA26004@adacore.com> <20091124150533.GA8964@caradoc.them.org>

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:05:33AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Meanwhile, here's a patch that handles "t" and "task".  I talked to
> Andrew about this, and I still think we can get away without "+N" and
> "-N"; they're only accepted by an accident of strtol.

I have checked this in.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- RFC: Fix "break *EXP thread NUM"
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: RFC: Fix "break *EXP thread NUM"
  - From: Andrew Stubbs
- Re: RFC: Fix "break *EXP thread NUM"
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: RFC: Fix "break *EXP thread NUM"
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: RFC: Fix "break *EXP thread NUM"
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]