RE: GDB MI Reverse Commands added [3 of 3]

["Jakob Engblom" <jakob at virtutech dot com>]

> It does not seem like any of them were addressed. When they are addressed,
> this patch is OK. Because the only non-mechanical change is replacement of
> FIXME with a suitable comment, and reverse-mode experts are in much better
> position to decide if a comment captures the behaviour properly, I don't
> think I have to re-review any revision of this patch -- please commit directly
> when you think it's ready.

I think they are. The latest file that Michael Snyder attached:

* Is called "mi-reverse.exp"

* Does use set MIFLAGS "-i=mi" 

* And the FIXME comment has been replaced with a better comment:

    # Test exec-reverse-next
    #   It takes two steps to get back to the previous line,
    #   as the first step moves us to the start of the current line,
    #   and the one after that moves back to the previous line.

    mi_execute_to "exec-next --reverse 2" \
 	"end-stepping-range" "main" "" \
 	"basics.c" $line_main_hello "" \
 	"reverse next to get over the call to do_nothing"

So it looks to me like all the comments have been addressed, in the patch in the
email at http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-12/msg00199.html . 


Best regards,

/jakob

_______________________________________________________

Jakob Engblom, PhD, Technical Marketing Manager

Virtutech?????????????????? Direct: +46 8 690 07 47???
Drottningholmsvägen 22????? Mobile: +46 709 242 646??
11243 Stockholm???????????? Web:??? www.virtutech.com?
Sweden
________________________________________________________
?