This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: unbreak typedefed bitfield

From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>, Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:37:28 +0400
Subject: Re: RFA: unbreak typedefed bitfield
References: <200912181541.30891.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <m37hsgcl0p.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20091221171500.GA16198@caradoc.them.org> <200912212018.33780.vladimir@codesourcery.com>

> IMO, this usage should just go, in preference to
> 
> 	type_set_length (type, DW_UNSND (attr));

I tend to agree, but maybe for a different reason. I think we should
eventually try to make struct type and main_type opaque, which will
force to get rid of the macros and provide accessors instead.

-- 
Joel

References:
- RFA: unbreak typedefed bitfield
  - From: Vladimir Prus
- Re: RFA: unbreak typedefed bitfield
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: RFA: unbreak typedefed bitfield
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: RFA: unbreak typedefed bitfield
  - From: Vladimir Prus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]