This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Support the new PPC476 processor
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- Cc: bauerman at br dot ibm dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, luisgpm at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com, tyrlik at us dot ibm dot com
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 06:06:48 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Support the new PPC476 processor
- References: <20091230221535.GA25399@caradoc.them.org>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:15:35 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
> tyrlik@us.ibm.com
>
> > Thanks for the explanations. I think we should emulate this on
> > architectures that don't have this in hardware (it doesn't sound
> > hard).
>
> How do you mean? It seems basically impossible to me.
How is it impossible to put several breakpoints covering a range of
addresses?