This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Why does ui_out_field_core_addr pad with leading zeroes?

From: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>, Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>, Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:56:30 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] Why does ui_out_field_core_addr pad with leading zeroes?
References: <20100318173015.6765784413@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <e394668d1003181238p1ccf89b0s682db8cbe1c7fd10@mail.gmail.com> <20100318195050.GA11586@caradoc.them.org>

On Thursday 18 March 2010 19:51:05, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I may be alone, and at risk of bikeshedding, but I think this looks
> weird:

You're not.  That was the reason I asked for before-any-patch,
vs currently proposed change.

> [They both look a bit weird to me though.  My ideal UI for this stuff
> resizes based on contents...]

We do this currently, but the code bases on address
bits, assuming we'll print the leading zeros.

-- 
Pedro Alves

References:
- [RFC] Why does ui_out_field_core_addr pad with leading zeroes?
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: [RFC] Why does ui_out_field_core_addr pad with leading zeroes?
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: [RFC] Why does ui_out_field_core_addr pad with leading zeroes?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]