This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[RFA] kfail longjmp.exp tests due to bug 9270
- From: dje at google dot com (Doug Evans)
- To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: [RFA] kfail longjmp.exp tests due to bug 9270
Anyone mind if I mark these as kfail for amd64?
2010-03-18 Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
* gdb.base/longjmp.exp: Mark tests that fail on x86_64 due to
bug 9270 as kfail.
Index: longjmp.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/longjmp.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.4 longjmp.exp
--- longjmp.exp 1 Jan 2010 07:32:01 -0000 1.4
+++ longjmp.exp 18 Mar 2010 22:13:19 -0000
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ gdb_test "break $bp_miss_step_1" \
gdb_test "next" "longjmps\\+\\+;.*" "next over setjmp (1)"
gdb_test "next" "longjmp \\(env, 1\\);.*" "next to longjmp (1)"
+setup_kfail "gdb/9270" "x86_64-*-*"
set msg "next over longjmp(1)"
gdb_test_multiple "next" $msg {
-re ".*patt1.*$gdb_prompt $" {
@@ -103,6 +104,7 @@ gdb_test "break $bp_miss_step_2" \
gdb_test "next" "call_longjmp.*" "next over setjmp (2)"
+setup_kfail "gdb/9270" "x86_64-*-*"
set msg "next over call_longjmp (2)"
gdb_test_multiple "next" $msg {
-re ".*patt2.*$gdb_prompt $" {
@@ -127,4 +129,5 @@ gdb_test "break $bp_start_test_3" \
"breakpoint at pattern 3 start"
gdb_test "continue" "patt3.*" "continue to breakpoint at pattern 3 start"
+setup_kfail "gdb/9270" "x86_64-*-*"
gdb_test "next" "longjmp caught.*" "next over patt3"